Today I issued a media release noting that government will be introducing a debatable motion next week to move the issue of ride-hailing to an all-party committee. As noted in the release, reproduced below, the committee, comprises MLAs from all three parties, will engage with expert witnesses, debate the issue and produce a report to be released by February 15, 2018. The intention is to inform the development of subsequent ride-hailing legislation that will be brought forward next year.
This an exciting development for the BC Greens. I have thrice (twice under the BC Liberals and once under the BC NDP) introduced a private members bill designed to create the regulatory environment that would enable ridesharing in BC (it is already occurring but in an unregulated fashion). It looks like we are finally moving forward in a tripartisan fashion.
Weaver announces that ride-hailing will go to all-party committee
For immediate release
November 23, 2017
VICTORIA, B.C. – Andrew Weaver, leader of the B.C. Green Party, announced today that ride-hailing will go to an all-party committee of MLAs. For several weeks the B.C. Greens have been working with the B.C. NDP to develop an approach that would allow important questions related to ride-hailing to be canvassed. The committee, comprised of MLAs from all three parties, will engage with expert witnesses, debate the issue and produce a report to be released by February 15, 2018 intended to inform subsequent ride-hailing legislation next year.
“I am delighted that this issue will finally be addressed in a collaborative fashion by all three parties,” Weaver said.
“The committee’s report will tackle key questions not addressed in the terms of reference created by the government for their review of the taxi industry. We will consider important issues like insurance, public safety and the impact of ride-hailing on different communities and municipalities across the province.
“It has been six years since ride-hailing companies first attempted to enter the B.C. market. All three parties have now agreed that we need to bring this technology to B.C. in a regulated fashion. My goal with this committee is to make this the last holiday season in which British Columbians are faced with fewer transportation options than every other major city in North America.”
Weaver introduced a Private Member’s Bill to enable ride-hailing in B.C. for the third time in October. In-mid October the B.C. NDP announced they had hired Dan Hara to conduct a review of the taxi industry, however, the terms of reference did not explicitly include ride-hailing.
-30-
Media contact
Jillian Oliver, Press Secretary
+1 778-650-0597 | jillian.oliver@leg.bc.ca
2 Comments
Can you please explain what is ‘green’ about a transportation system that encourages people to move around one-per-automobile? Can you please explain what is ‘green’ about a transportation system that encourages more use of the oldest vehicles in the fleet – vehicles that are much less likely than taxis to be hybrids, let alone electric? Can you please explain what is ‘green’ about a ubiquitous transportation choice that encourages urban sprawl? Why are not not putting your effort firmly and decisively behind mass public transport systems that get as many people as possible in the same vehicle, a vehicle that is more likely to use electric traction, and that encourages compact urban development? I will be watching with interest to see if you post these questions and are willing to try to answer them seriously.
As someone who travels worldwide on business (and pleasure) the fact that BC is possibly the last place on earth without ride sharing is frankly an embarrassment. What will this all party committee conclude that thousands of urban jurisdictions all over the world cannot?
How much extra information can really be useful? Is this a case of taxpayers paying MLAs to come up with a conclusion that any intelligent individual can come with?
The conclusion is simple. Taxis in BC are among the most expensive and least available in the world. Uber should be introduced with the appropriate safeguards. What other conclusion could possibly be reached?