Adam Olsen and I today announced that we will both serve as intervenors in the upcoming new National Energy Board hearings on the Transmountain pipeline project.

Below I reproduce our press release outlining our intentions.

We remain profoundly perplexed as to why the BC NDP government has not given the federal government the 30 days notice required to pull out of the equivalency agreement.

As I noted earlier, the BC NDP campaigned on using every tool in the tool box to stop the the Transmountain pipeline project. The recent Federal Court of Appeal ruling demonstrated that politics was put ahead of evidence and reconciliation in the federal cabinet approval of the project. This presented the BC NDP with a very powerful tool.

Given that the provincial cabinet’s approval relied on the same NEB report, and in light of the Federal Court of Appeal’s ruling that the report was “impermissibly flawed”, the BC Government has every right to pull out of the Equivalency Agreement and conduct its own, independent environmental assessment.

This is particularly important in light of the “it will be built” rhetoric emanating from the Trudeau government. How can British Columbians trust an environmental assessment process when the final answer has already been prescribed? The answer is simple, it can’t.

We have yet to receive any compelling reason as to why the BC NDP are not withdrawing from the equivalency agreement.


Media Release


B.C. Green MLAs Weaver and Olsen to intervene in new Trans Mountain NEB hearings
For immediate release
October 3, 2018

VICTORIA, B.C. – Andrew Weaver, leader, and Adam Olsen, spokesperson for Indigenous relations and reconciliation of the B.C. Green Party have applied to intervene in the new Trans Mountain National Energy Board (NEB) hearings. Weaver and Olsen were both intervenors in the 2014 certificate hearing for the Trans Mountain Expansion project.

“Although we are concerned that this is yet another rushed process engineered to facilitate a political win, unfortunately right now it is the only one we’ve got,” said Weaver.

“The Prime Minister vowed that all new projects would be put through a new NEB process. Three years into his government’s mandate, that promise has still not been kept. The NEB has not even confirmed that marine shipping – one of the key reasons cited in the unanimous federal court decision – will be included in the scope. My previous intervention focused largely on the issue of marine shipping and I was deeply dissatisfied by the lack of answers to my questions. The NEB must do better this time.”

Weaver is a climate scientist with a specialty in ocean physics. His office has spent hundreds of hours on research on the Trans Mountain file ahead of his previous intervention. Olsen, who is a member of the Tsartlip First Nation in Brentwood Bay, will focus his intervention on the issue of consultation, as he did previously. Both have applied for participant funding.

“The federal government promised to advance reconciliation, but the federal court decision shows that their actions on Trans Mountain were in fact a setback,” said Olsen. “I do not see how you can have meaningful consultation and approach Indigenous people as partners when you have a predetermined outcome for a project. Regardless, I will continue to sit at the table because I feel it is my duty to do everything I can to fight for a better future for my province and for my people.”

-30-

Media contact
Jillian Oliver, Press Secretary
+1 778-650-0597 | jillian.oliver@leg.bc.ca

6 Comments

  1. Terry Hoffman-
    October 7, 2018 at 6:24 pm

    Change is needed immediately,
    but may take a longer – please don’t burn out. My deepest gratitude for your efforts. Terry

  2. Margit Boronkay-
    October 7, 2018 at 6:14 pm

    Since jobs now & revenue for investors seem to drive every decision, how can one make temporary, belt-tightening feasible & more attractive, while getting deep-pocketed investors to put their funds into renewables? If we could live more communally & share our resources with each other, everyone’s cost of living, stress, fear & insecurity would go down. As long as people have astronomical mortgages & see how volatile the economy is, they can only think of themselves & their immediate futures. This is understandable & common sense, as well as being documented by Maslow & others. Who is moving forward on urban planning & architecture with built-in, practical, communal features that go beyond co-ops & co-housing?

  3. Christine Cunningham-
    October 7, 2018 at 1:26 pm

    The Federal Govt always dictates the NEB agenda. Last time, the Federal Govt said there was to be no discussion about the pipeline/tank farm expansion on the ocean or on the earth’s climate. This time, it seems they are saying there can be discussion about the effect on the ocean but they are still not willing to listen to arguments regarding the effect of expanding fossil fuel trade on the earth’s climate. If we are going to look at world trade, we need to look at the damage that can be caused to the world’s climate and weigh the two.
    The effect of this expansion project on carbon emissions/climate also needs to be on the table. So does the safety of the population living next to pipelines and tank farms. Our safety has not yet been addressed.

  4. Tracy Lollie-
    October 6, 2018 at 7:45 pm

    Thankyou for your continuing backed by science and research fight, against those that push corruption based projects. Projects that are actually physically harmful to taxpayer’s health/lives, and the environment, and are projects “fixed” to appear of financial benefit for Canadians, when they are not. Not many in political office are interested in science. Loads of us are grateful.

  5. Beverley reid-
    October 5, 2018 at 2:39 pm

    Thankyou so much for protecting our coast my husband does risk assessment all the time and even said this is a big red flag

  6. Gail rodgers-
    October 3, 2018 at 8:02 pm

    Thank you guys for taking up the gauntlet for B.C.again…Someone in government has to be a leader in this..I agree that B.C. should divest itself of the equivalency agreement and do it’s own independent environmental assessment for the good of our coast..Thank you Gail Rodgers