Today in the Legislature I rose during question period to ask the Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction why the government had yet to increase the $375 shelter allowance for income assistance. This rate hasn’t increased in a decade yet housing costs have risen dramatically.
Below I reproduce the video and text of our exchange.
A. Weaver: In September, government raised social assistance rates by $100 per month. Not only, of course, do I support the move, but I also commend government for implementing this increase. Rates had been frozen for a decade, leaving people worse off year after year, as their buying power eroded with inflation and the affordability crisis exploded.
Nevertheless, while support payments have gone up, the shelter allowances have remained the same, at only $375 a month. This is far, far below what it actually costs to find shelter.
For example, the organization Raise the Rates found that in Vancouver, even a single-room-occupancy hotel, known as an SRO — the cheapest form of housing available — cost $548 a month. And a number of advocates and journalists have documented the appalling and unsafe living conditions that people are forced to endure in many SROs in Vancouver.
My question to the Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction is this: do you agree that $375 does not come close to reflecting the true cost of finding shelter in B.C., let alone shelter that is safe and secure?
Hon. S. Simpson: I thank the Leader of the Third Party, though I did lose the bet on getting a question-free session.
I agree with the Leader of the Third Party. Persons on income assistance, persons with disabilities and hundreds of thousands of other people who are living vulnerable and living poor are struggling immensely in this province today. I’m proud of the $100 increase that we put in place, the first increase in over a decade for people on income assistance.
As I said, there are significant numbers of working poor in this province who are struggling as well, and I’m excited that at the end of this week, we’re going to have a $1.30 increase in the minimum wage, the first step on the way to a $15.20 minimum wage.
On the issue of housing, the member is correct: it is challenging, as we move forward, but we have many steps that we’re taking. I’m excited about the biggest investment in housing in the history of British Columbia in the February budget. I’m excited about the increases around rental assistance programs and SAFER grants. I’m really excited about the 2,000 modular units that are out there being built today, that are being occupied today, that are helping the most vulnerable people in the province, people living homeless, and giving them a place to live. That’s progress, and that’s leadership.
The last thing I would say is: we’ll bring in the poverty reduction plan, and yes, we’re going to deal with housing.
A. Weaver: There certainly was a lot of pent-up answer waiting for a question there.
A substantial gap remains between social assistance rates and what is required to maintain a dignified standard of living. That’s why during the election the B.C. Greens committed to transitioning people to livable incomes, starting with an increase in social assistance rates by 50 percent above 2017 levels by 2020.
The previous critic on this file said last year: “Every year I ask the minister how on earth they come up with $375 as the shelter allowance for income assistance, because there’s nowhere in B.C. that’s available for $375.” I would agree with her, but unfortunately, this remains true today, and the average rent of a bachelor apartment in Vancouver is over $1,000 a month.
My question, again, to the Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction is this: will you increase the shelter allowance as part of the forthcoming poverty reduction program and strategy?
Hon. S. Simpson: We have 557,000 people living in poverty in this province. We’ve had the highest rates of poverty for over a decade and a half, pretty much every year, and certainly the highest rates around child poverty.
We have challenges. We need to deal with the affordability questions that the member’s talking about. We need to create opportunities for people to break the cycle of poverty. We need to deal with the issues of social isolation and social inclusion for people struggling in poverty, whether they be the 100,000 children living in poverty, the Indigenous and the disabled who are living in poverty.
We’re going to do that. We’re going to bring legislation this fall that will legislate the poverty reduction plan, and British Columbia will no longer be the only province in this country without a poverty plan. We will end that this fall. We will bring the plan shortly after, and we will address those issues of improving the lives of people in this province, including on the housing issue.
Today the Attorney General released his long awaited report containing recommendations for the upcoming fall referendum on proportional representation. Our spokesperson on proportional representation, Sonia Furstenau, issued a media release (reproduced below) in response to the report.
B.C. Green Caucus statement on Attorney General’s proportional representation recommendations
For immediate release
May 30, 2018
VICTORIA, B.C. – Sonia Furstenau, B.C. Green Party spokesperson for electoral reform, responded to the Attorney General’s report and recommendations on B.C.’s upcoming proportional representation referendum.
“I look forward to the Attorney General’s recommendations being finalized by cabinet. It’s time to get started on this important conversation about the future of our democracy,” said Furstenau.
“I am pleased that the AG took advice from a wide range of voices who participated in this consultation process and that his recommendations reflect the concerns and desires of the whole province. Going forward is that voters receive good quality, factual information and a healthy, vibrant debate about their electoral process.
“The B.C. Greens support proportional representation because it leads to more democratic outcomes. Too many people feel they have to vote strategically against whichever party they don’t want. Proportional representation gives voters the chance to vote for what they actually want, so they can vote out of hope, not fear.
“Proportional representation also requires parties to work together to put policy ahead of politics. Under First Past the Post in B.C., parties have received 100% of the power with as little as 39% of the vote and do not have to consult or collaborate with anyone. This leaves voters feeling like their government does not represent their interests and puts political parties into an adversarial, zero-sum situation where they become more focused on tearing each other down than working on solutions to the challenges and opportunities we all face.”
-30-
Media contact
Jillian Oliver, Press Secretary
+1 778-650-0597 | jillian.oliver@leg.bc.ca
Today the BC Green and BC NDP caucuses celebrated the one year anniversary of the signing of our historic Confidence and Supply Agreement.
The Premier and I took the opportunity to celebrate the event at the offices of Alacrity Foundation in Victoria. This was a fitting venue since Alacrity represents a stellar example of innovation in the new economy.
Alacrity has helped bring over $225 million to B.C.’s technology ecosystem through its investor readiness program and on April 19, 2018, the Province announced that it was investing more than $711,000 over the next three years in the Alacrity Foundation of B.C.’s Cleantech Scale-Up program.
Below I reproduce the brief remarks I gave at the event as well as our joint press release.
I am delighted to be here to celebrate the one year anniversary of the announcement that we had reached a Confidence and Supply Agreement with the BC NDP.
The 2017 election was historic for our Party. We doubled our popular vote count and tripled our seat count.
When the results came in as a minority government, we felt an enormous weight on our shoulders. We took our decision very seriously.
In the end, we decided BC needed a change. It was clear that most British Columbians wanted things to be done differently.
There was a clear desire for bolder, forward-looking policies on a range of important issues:
affordability;
environmental protection;
investments like child care and public education that will give our children the best possible future.
CASA is the result of two distinct parties coming together around shared values.
Ultimately we want the same thing:
to improve the health and wellbeing of British Columbians;
to make government more responsive to the challenges and opportunities they face in their everyday lives;
and to set our province up for success.
There have been ups and downs in the first year, but like any relationship our Agreement has required us to work through our issues and come together to find solutions that we can both support.
This is a special opportunity – under majority governments, a party can get 100% of the power with as little as 39% of the vote and push through its agenda without having to consult or collaborate with any other parties.
This has often left British Columbians feeling disconnected and like their government is not listening to their concerns. In just the first year since signing our agreement, we have worked together to:
ban big money;
reform the lobbying industry;
make historic investments in childcare and public education;
advance key elements of the BC Greens’ economic vision for the province.
And we’re just getting started.
Right now, I am hard at work with Minister Heyman to develop a climate plan that puts a bold vision for BC’s economy centred around innovation at its core.
We have a unique opportunity to make BC a leader again in climate action.
While climate change poses significant risks and challenges, there are opportunities to be had as the world transitions to the low carbon economy.
But the benefits will only flow to those who are leaders – not the last adopters.
BC was once a leader in climate action, providing an example to the world that a strong economy and bold climate action are perfectly compatible.
I am looking forward to unveiling our plan to make BC a leader once again.
There are challenges that lie ahead, but I am deeply encouraged by our ability to come together to work through our differences.
John and I both know that there is more at stake than the future of our two parties – we are united in our love of this province and we want to set it up for the best possible future.
Our caucus remains committed to doing everything we can to work collaboratively to advance more solutions so that we can deliver on our shared commitments to the people of BC
Thank you.
For Immediate Release 2018PREM0081-001062 May 29, 2018 |
Office of the Premier Office of the Leader of the B.C. Greens |
One year later, CASA continues to deliver strong, stable government that puts people first
|
|
VICTORIA – Premier John Horgan and B.C. Green Caucus Leader, Andrew Weaver, marked the one-year anniversary of the Confidence and Supply Agreement (CASA) at the Alacrity Foundation in Victoria.
The leaders highlighted co-operation to put people first, and investment in clean tech, innovation and a resilient economy that creates good jobs for people in B.C. — now and into the future. “When we agreed to CASA, we agreed to make democracy work for people and focus on solutions to the challenges facing British Columbians,” said Premier Horgan. “By working together, we’ve accomplished a lot to make life more affordable, improve the services people count on, and build a strong, sustainable economy that works for people. And we will keep working together, every day, to make life better for people in B.C.” The Province recently announced support for the Alacrity Foundation to help clean tech companies expand. The support for Alacrity is part of the progress made on CASA commitments to advance innovation and technology, and the collaborative work on the climate action strategy that continues. “Over the last year, we’ve shown the people of B.C. that co-operative government can lead to better, evidence-based policies that will set our province up for a bright future,” said Weaver. “Core elements of our economic platform are part of CASA. With the establishment of the Emerging Economy Task Force and the appointment of B.C.’s first innovation commissioner, the province will be better positioned to adapt and prosper in the changing economy of the 21st century.” CASA commitments on climate action were emphasized by both leaders, as they stressed the importance of decisive action and ongoing work to ensure B.C. is a climate leader. “Climate change affects everyone, and our shared future depends on making B.C. a climate leader with a strong economy that works better for people and the environment,” said Premier Horgan. “The previous government stalled climate action and failed to meet targets. We are working collaboratively towards a credible and effective climate strategy that creates opportunities for people. I’m excited about what we can achieve together.” The Government of British Columbia recently introduced legislation to update the Province’s greenhouse gas reduction targets, setting the stage for a renewed climate action strategy to be released in the fall. “There is much more to be done, but I look forward to working together to make B.C. a leader in climate action once again,” said Weaver. “We have an incredible opportunity to build a thriving economy centred around innovation, and keep our commitment to younger generations. A climate plan that is a collaborative effort by two distinct parties is a unique chance to put people ahead of politics, to think beyond the typical electoral cycle and set our province up for the brightest possible future. British Columbia has so much to offer and we can and shall be a leader in the new economy.” In addition to growing B.C.’s tech economy, supporting innovation and making B.C. a leader in climate action, CASA lists child care, team-based health care and housing as priorities. Quick Facts:
Learn more: To learn more about the CASA Secretariat and agreement, visit: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/organizational-structure/ministries-organizations/central-government-agencies/government-communications/casa To learn more about Alacrity’s BC Cleantech Scale-Up program, visit: https://www.alacritycanada.com/programs/ |
|
Contacts: |
|
Jen Holmwood Deputy Communications Director Office of the Premier 250 818-4881 |
Jillian Oliver Press Secretary B.C. Greens 778 650-0597 |
In what can only be described as a desperate attempt to save face, the Federal Government announced today that it would use taxpayer money to buy Trans Mountain’s Canadian assets which include the existing pipeline from Alberta to the Burnaby refinery.
Below I reproduced the media statement that we released in response to this action.
Weaver: Federal government decision to buy Trans Mountain a betrayal
For immediate release
May 29, 2018
VICTORIA, B.C. – Andrew Weaver, leader of the B.C. Green Party, issued the following statement in response to the federal government’s decision to buy the Trans Mountain Pipeline.
“This is a betrayal by a government who ran on a hopeful vision for a better future,” said Weaver.
“A government that promised to end fossil fuel subsidies and to champion the clean economy should not be spending billions of dollars of taxpayer money to buy out a fossil fuel expansion project. We should be investing in growth industries that are clearly where the world is heading. Investing in this pipeline is like investing in the horse and buggy industry at the advent of the car.
“This is a deeply troubling decision on many levels. Canada stands to sacrifice its international reputation, irreplaceable iconic species like the Southern resident Killer Whales, and its commitments to meet its Paris Climate targets and to reconcile with Indigenous people – all while putting enormous risk on Canadian taxpayers.
“It is clear that the world is transitioning away from fossil fuels. The cost of renewable energy continues to fall – solar and wind are already cheaper than coal in many jurisdictions. Last week, a report by Aurora Energy Research projected the adoption of electric vehicles could wipe out $19 trillion in oil revenue. You don’t build infrastructure like this for the next few years – this is built to last for the next 40-50. This is not the infrastructure we need in 10 years and certainly not what we need in 40.”
-30-
Media contact
Jillian Oliver, Press Secretary
+1 778-650-0597 | jillian.oliver@leg.bc.ca
Over the last year or so I have twice (February 2017 and October 2017) introduced a bill to protect agricultural from continuing to be subject to speculative investment activity.
Today during budget estimates for the Ministry of Finance I asked the Minister why her government had neither applied the foreign buyers tax nor the speculation tax to land in the ALR. In particular, I sought answers to why her government is not stepping in to stop prime farmland being carved up and converted into mega mansions.
Below I reproduce the video and text of our exchange.
A. Weaver: I just have a couple of questions in two areas to finish my estimates questions to the Finance Minister. The first is in the area of ALR protection. The ALR was left unprotected from the measures announced in the budget to cool the market for the residential real estate sector, which has encouraged speculation in ALR. My first question is: why didn’t the foreign buyer tax and the speculation tax apply to the ALR? And why was, for example, foreign ownership not restricted to the ALR, like has been done in areas across Canada, including Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec and PEI?
Hon. C. James: Thank you to the member for the question. I think there are two pieces I just want to focus on.
I think the first one is…. As the member will know, there’s a comprehensive policy review going on with the Minister of Agriculture right now in looking at a whole range of issues related to agricultural land. We’re doing our policy work — side by side, I guess, is the best way to describe it — along with the work that’s being done in the Agriculture Ministry. So we don’t want to either get ahead or be duplicating work that’s going on.
As the member will know, there was a large consultation done, and so people were giving their feedback. To look at further work that needs to be done around the agricultural land, we’re doing that policy review, as I said, along with the Agriculture Minister.
But I think it’s important to note that both the foreign buyers tax and the speculation tax do apply to houses, to the residential property that’s on agricultural land. I know the member’s speaking about a broader base when it comes to the agricultural land, but in fact, those taxes do apply to the class 1 residential housing that is on agricultural land if they’re in the areas that are covered by those taxes.
A. Weaver: Yes indeed, I was concerned about the broad, bare land of agricultural land that can be purchased that does not have a foreign buyers tax. Then Richmond council can be approached, and that land could then have a mega-mansion put on it, which was the subject of the concern being expressed here.
In the budget, the minister stated that she’d be changing the tax treatment of residential property in the ALR in order to close property tax loopholes. My question is then: how are you changing property tax treatment, and when can we expect to see this done?
Hon. C. James: We’re looking at the changes. These are draft changes to the School Act to exclude ALR properties that are in the residential property class from the 50 percent land exemption. We’re going through that process right now, again, as I said, in tandem with the work that’s going on in the Agriculture Ministry. This would require changes, so we certainly hope it’ll come by the fall.
A. Weaver: Again, the review. We’ve been talking about the review, and the Minister of Agriculture is indeed undertaking such a review. But in fact, we’re not waiting for the results of the review before changing the tax treatment on residential property.
We know what’s happening in an ongoing fashion in Richmond is that the speculation and mega-mansions are devouring ALR there. For example, last year, Richmond lost 50 farms due to mega-mansions. We can’t, frankly, afford to wait a year to see more action.
Why are we not taking immediate steps now to impose the foreign buyers tax and the speculation tax on the ALR land? What is stopping the minister from doing that?
Hon. C. James: I certainly appreciate the urgency of this issue. I appreciate the examples that have come forward, particularly in Richmond, as the member mentions. They are issues right now and challenges right now. But there is, as I said, the comprehensive review going on. We need to make sure that…. Many of these changes have to happen through different acts, not through one act.
For example, the changes to the school tax related to the school tax on agricultural land also have to be changes to the Assessment Act. Again, we don’t want to piecemeal it. We want to make sure that the changes that we make are really going to make a difference. That’s why we’re working together with the Agriculture Ministry.
There is an opportunity, hopefully, in the fall to bring forward those changes, to have coordinated with the feedback that people gave and to be able to make a comprehensive change that will prevent the kinds of examples that the member has raised.